<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copycat Linux?</title>
	<link>http://blog.hydrasystemsllc.com/2009/02/22/copycat-linux/</link>
	<description>The blog of Petros Koutoupis.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: hukares</title>
		<link>http://blog.hydrasystemsllc.com/2009/02/22/copycat-linux/#comment-695</link>
		<author>hukares</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hydrasystemsllc.com/2009/02/22/copycat-linux/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>"stopped caring about the naming controversy a while ago and you will too" -- Aronzak

are you trying to hex on us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;stopped caring about the naming controversy a while ago and you will too&#8221; &#8212; Aronzak</p>
<p>are you trying to hex on us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aronzak</title>
		<link>http://blog.hydrasystemsllc.com/2009/02/22/copycat-linux/#comment-301</link>
		<author>Aronzak</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hydrasystemsllc.com/2009/02/22/copycat-linux/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>"People need to know that GNU/Linux is NOT a copycat." Why? So that you 
can prove something? Here's a tip; stop getting into arguments about who 
copied who (which are entirely subjective) and tell your friends that 
Linux (yes, I stopped caring about the naming controversy a while ago 
and you will too) is a tool that they can choose to use or not. A few of 
them will install it within 6 months. They won't become passionate about 
it, but they will give it a try now and then.

"are average end users that “stupid” that they need to be kept in 
familiar territory only?". The fact that Windows XP is appearing on 
underpowered devices intended mainly for web browsing is clear proof 
that this is the case. If you want more, try 
http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/65877.html?wlc=1235391202. That's 
one of the less offensive ones. Try not to  answer your own question in 
your own post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People need to know that GNU/Linux is NOT a copycat.&#8221; Why? So that you<br />
can prove something? Here&#8217;s a tip; stop getting into arguments about who<br />
copied who (which are entirely subjective) and tell your friends that<br />
Linux (yes, I stopped caring about the naming controversy a while ago<br />
and you will too) is a tool that they can choose to use or not. A few of<br />
them will install it within 6 months. They won&#8217;t become passionate about<br />
it, but they will give it a try now and then.</p>
<p>&#8220;are average end users that “stupid” that they need to be kept in<br />
familiar territory only?&#8221;. The fact that Windows XP is appearing on<br />
underpowered devices intended mainly for web browsing is clear proof<br />
that this is the case. If you want more, try<br />
<a href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/65877.html?wlc=1235391202." rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/65877.html?wlc=1235391202.</a> That&#8217;s<br />
one of the less offensive ones. Try not to  answer your own question in<br />
your own post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.hydrasystemsllc.com/2009/02/22/copycat-linux/#comment-295</link>
		<author>Martin</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hydrasystemsllc.com/2009/02/22/copycat-linux/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>I agree, it is our branding after all.

It is more difficult to create your own brand and to promote your own ideals and views. But that is what is _really_ required in order to be successful 10 years away.

Why are there always practicalists who insist that the easy road right now is always the best?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, it is our branding after all.</p>
<p>It is more difficult to create your own brand and to promote your own ideals and views. But that is what is _really_ required in order to be successful 10 years away.</p>
<p>Why are there always practicalists who insist that the easy road right now is always the best?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
